YarifyStart a conversation

NIS2 software.

Focused delivery for standards that generic product teams cannot safely simplify.

1

Concrete starting point inside this service area.

Accountable for your suppliers, not just yourself.

NIS2 makes an organisation directly accountable for its suppliers' cybersecurity posture, not just its own — a large in-scope company now has to run a documented risk assessment on every material vendor and be able to show that assessment to a regulator, not just to procurement. Chasing that evidence through email and static questionnaires doesn't scale past a handful of suppliers, and it produces exactly the kind of unauditable trail NIS2 was designed to eliminate.

An automated assessment tool has to model NIS2's actual third-party risk criteria, track which vendors are overdue for reassessment, and surface the ones whose risk profile changed since the last review — a live register a compliance team can defend in an audit, not a spreadsheet frozen at the moment it was last updated.

A delivery path your team can inspect.

NIS2 should end in a system people can operate, not a document that creates another translation step.

01

Make the requirement testable.

Turn source text, technical standards, and deadlines into explicit product decisions.

02

Fit the systems already in place.

Map owners, data sources, approvals, and failure paths before choosing the software shape.

03

Ship evidence with the feature.

Include the operational trail, documentation, and maintainable architecture the requirement demands.

Start with the system you have.

If nis2 software is on your roadmap, describe what you run today and where the requirement gets stuck. An engineer will answer with a concrete first move.